Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ ¼ö¸® ½Ã Ç¥¸é󸮰¡ °áÇÕ°­µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

EFFECT OF SURFACE TREATMENTS ON THE REPAIR BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITES

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 35±Ç 4È£ p.692 ~ 699
ÃÖÁ¤ÀÎ, ±è¿µÀç, ±èÁ¤¿í, ÀÌ»óÈÆ, ±èÁ¾Ã¶, ÇѼ¼Çö, Àå±âÅÃ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖÁ¤ÀΠ( Choi Jung-In ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
±è¿µÀç ( Kim Young-Jae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
±èÁ¤¿í ( Kim Jung-Wook ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
ÀÌ»óÈÆ ( Lee Sang-Hoon ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
±èÁ¾Ã¶ ( Kim Chong-Chul ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
ÇѼ¼Çö ( Hahn Se-Hyun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò
Àå±âÅà( Jang Ki-Taeg ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç ¹× Ä¡Çבּ¸¼Ò

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº Ç¥¸é󸮰¡ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ·¹Áø°ú »õ·Î¿î ·¹Áø »çÀÌÀÇ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÁغñµÈ ·¹Áø ½ÃÆíÀ» 6±ºÀ¸·Î ÀÓÀÇ·Î ¹èºÐÇÏ¿© °¢°¢ÀÇ Ç¥¸é󸮸¦ ÇÑ ÈÄ ¼ö¸®¿ë ·¹ÁøÀ» ÃàÁ¶ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÏÁÖÀÏ°£ º¸°ü ÈÄ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í ÀÏ¿øºÐ»ê ºÐ¼®¹ýÀ¸·Î Åë°èó¸®ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 1. 3±º°ú 4±º(air abrasion)Àº 1±º(»êºÎ½Ä)¿¡ ºñÇØ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ°¡ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(p<0.05). 5±º°ú 6±º(diamond bur)Àº 1±º(»êºÎ½Ä)¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ôÀº Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³ÂÀ¸³ª Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p>0.05). 2. 2±º(ÀÚ°¡ºÎ½Ä Á¢ÂøÁ¦)Àº 1±º(»êºÎ½Ä)¿¡ ºñÇØ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ°¡ ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p>0.05). 3. 3±º(air abrasion)°ú 4±º(air abrasion+»êºÎ½Ä)¿¡¼­ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â À¯ÀÇÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p>0.05). 4. 5±º(diamond bur)°ú 6±º(diamond bur+»êºÎ½Ä)¿¡¼­ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â À¯ÀÇÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p>0.05). °á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î, º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ ¼ö¸® ½Ã air abrasionÀ¸·Î Ç¥¸é󸮸¦ ÇßÀ» ¶§ÀÇ °áÇÕ°­µµ°¡ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í, »êºÎ½Ä ¹æ¹ý°ú 󸮿© ºÎ´Â ¼ö¸®°­µµ¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength between new and old composite resin. The prepared resin specimens were separated 6 groups, and each group then received a different surface treatment. Then the repair material was added. Shear bond strengths for repair were measured after 7 days and the results were analyzed by using one way ANOVA. The results were as follows; 1. Group 3, 4(air abrasion) showed significantly higher shear bond strength than Group 1(phosphoric acid)(p<0.05). Group 5, 6(diamond bur) showed higher bond strength than Group 1(phosphoric acid) but not significantly different( p>0.05). 2. Group 2(self-etching adhesive) showed lower shear bond strength than Group 1(phosphoric acid) but not significantly different(p>0.05). 3. There was no statistically significant difference between Group 3(air abrasion) and Group 4(air abrasion+etching). 4. There was no statistically significant difference between Group 5(diamond bur) and Group 6(diamond bur+etching). In conclusion, the surface treatment with air abrasion resulted in higher repair bond strength than other methods. Repair bond strength was not significantly affected by acid etching.

Å°¿öµå

º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø; ¼ö¸®; Ç¥¸éó¸®; Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ
Composite resin; Repair; Surface treatment; Shear bond strength

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI